ANR reply from Erichero : Not 90% . Maybe 50%

Hi Myles,

I don’t disagree with 90% of what you say, maybe 50%. 

Just so you have feedback, the only reason I keep coming back here is that I’m a typical Arsenal fan – buying the future based on the past.

I remember the good old days when Myles was at his best, making astute observations as to why Arsenal were winning the league.  While we were swimming in the joy of a 4-0 win, you’d break down the intricacies of the moves that won the game – it was compelling stuff.

I’m afraid you’re caught on a stuck record now, playing the villain in the Wengerdom trilogy, always looking to grab him at his moment of weakness, maybe throwing a sly whack at his co-star Thierry.

I’m waiting in anticipation for the old Myles.  For the days when 90% of your writing was positive, when you spent more time writing about what a terrific prospect Vermaelen is, rather than what a trojan Denilson is.

Is there hope?  Will we see the real Myles again, or was the past the real illusion?

Cheers, Eric

 


 

Villain replies :

All of life is an illusion. Reality is in side your head. Each of us is a lens. We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are. Hope is what I had before I had before I was disappointed and disappointed again. Life is a long series of disappointments illuminated by the occasional small triumph.

A reader called Louise wrote this week and said I was “sometimes too cynical”. Women have more empathy and less cynicism, I find.

Vermaelen was a terrific prospect before he became captain of Ajax.

Last season he was one of the best centrebacks in the Premier League. He’s good enough to play for Manchester United.